Trump’s Crypto Dinner Slammed by Attendee as “Trash Food” and “Bullshit Speech”
- Sammy Salmela
- May 26
- 2 min read
Article with AI Analysis
Date: 2025-05-26
Source: Cointelegraph, WIRED, Fortune
Introduction
What was supposed to be an exclusive event for top holders of the Trump memecoin turned into a PR mishap. At a high-profile dinner hosted by Donald Trump at his Virginia golf club, guests reportedly paid millions in crypto for the privilege only to be served what one called “Walmart steak” and a speech that felt “like bullshit.”
The Dinner: Lavish Venue, Disappointing Menu
Nicholas Pinto, a TikTok influencer who reportedly spent $300,000 on Trump’s crypto token to attend the event, was brutally honest about his experience. Despite the luxurious setting, Pinto described the three-course meal organic salad, filet mignon, halibut, and lava cake as the worst he’d ever had at a Trump property. “Only the bread and butter were good,” he said. Guests expected at least a signature Trump move: McDonald’s or pizza.
While some attendees found the food “OK,” the overall sentiment was that the evening didn’t live up to expectations.
Trump’s Crypto Speech: “Who Knows” Meets “Who Cares”
Trump’s brief remarks were delivered from a script and lacked energy. Referring vaguely to crypto’s potential, he told the crowd: “This is really something that may be special who knows, right?” Pinto and others criticised the speech as empty and rushed. Trump reportedly left the event immediately after speaking, skipping promised interactions like presenting guests with commemorative watches.
Political Backlash and Legal Scrutiny
Following the event, 35 U.S. Democrats called for a Justice Department investigation into whether the dinner violated bribery laws and the Constitution’s emoluments clause. The presence of foreign token holders added fuel to the controversy, highlighting the risks of mixing political ambition with speculative crypto ventures.
AI-Powered Sentiment Analysis
Our AI analysis of this article revealed:
• Sentiment Score: 0.83 – Indicates an emotionally charged response, mostly negative or mocking.
• Financial Sentiment: 0.98 – High financial relevance due to crypto assets and legal implications.• Polarity Score: 0.064 – Slightly positive polarity, but almost neutral in tone due to satirical framing.
• Subjectivity Score: 0.449 – Balanced mix of subjective opinions (mainly from Pinto) and factual reporting.
These scores suggest the article is emotionally engaging, politically sensitive, and highly relevant for readers tracking the intersection of crypto, politics, and influence.
Read More
Read the full article on: https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump-crypto-dinner-guests-say-food-was-worst-ever
Stay ahead: register today at: hikarinova.com
Curious to see what’s coming?
Take a look at our free example trading signal here: signal.hikarinova.com it's a great way
to get a feel for ourhttp://hikarinova.com methods. (Naturally, our premium signals deliver even stronger results!)
Explore additional articles at hikarinova.com/blog and try our updated sentiment analysis tool for free at scorednews.com.
Disclaimer
This article was generated using AI and reviewed for accuracy. The information presented is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Always consult with a professional before making investment decisions.
Kommentare